The latest sequence of Channel 4’s actuality courting current Married at First Sight UK has sparked widespread criticism for normalising harmful behaviour. The charities Women’s Assist and Refuge have publicly condemned the current’s inclusion of a male participant with a historic previous of dwelling abuse accusations.
Social media backlash, however, has revealed one different harmful behaviour – longstanding class biases amongst viewers. That’s considerably evident in one of the simplest ways some viewers have described female members Holly Ditchfield and Polly Sellman as “chavs”.
I evaluation the intersection between gender and class in well-liked custom, so for me, the current’s reception raises a pressing question. Why do stereotypes of working-class girls persist so stubbornly throughout the British television panorama, similtaneously viewers turn into an increasing number of alert to various kinds of mistreatment and misconduct?
The time interval “chav” emerged as a excellent sort of classist insult in British media throughout the 2000s. Sociologist Imogen Tyler has described it as “a ubiquitous time interval of abuse for the white poor”.
The distinctly British time interval “chav”, when utilized to girls and girls, targets perceived vulgarity, lack of sophistication and failures of right femininity. The time interval carries a few years of social stigma and moral judgement.
Looking out for one factor good? Reduce through the noise with a rigorously curated alternative of the latest releases, reside events and exhibitions, straight to your inbox every fortnight, on Fridays. Be part of proper right here.
On social media, Married at First Sight viewers repeatedly study Ditchfield and Sellman to notorious “chavs” from British well-liked custom. They range from Little Britain’s Vicky Pollardto comedian Catherine Tate’s character, Lauren Cooperto the late media persona Jade Goody. Goody’s remedy on one different Channel 4 actuality current, Large Brother, sparked nationwide debates about class and illustration in 2002.
Most revealing of these persistent comparisons is viewers’ comparability of the two girls to the “Fat Slags”. They’ve been Viz comic’s notorious cartoon characters Tracey Tunstall and Sandra Burke, who debuted in 1989.
These grotesque caricatures of working-class girls have been outlined primarily by their dimension, uninhibited sexual appetites and perceived vulgarity. That viewers nonetheless attain for these references demonstrates their enduring power as cultural touchstones. They proceed to frame and limit representations of working-class femininity.
Class distinction throughout the digital age
By means of the #MAFSUK hashtag on X (beforehand commonly known as Twitter), this class-based criticism has found new life and vigour.
On-line interactions using the hashtag signify what media scholar Mark Stewart identifies as a “digital nation”. The time interval refers to a digital home the place viewers reinforce class hierarchies through shared cultural references and in-jokes.
“Dwell tweeting” reconstructs what has been repeatedly misplaced throughout the an increasing number of fragmented TV-viewing experience – a British group unified by a collective understanding of sophistication signifiers.
When viewers mock Sellman’s vogue selections (for instance, claiming her hair resembles Vicky Pollard’s), they’re not merely making specific particular person observations. They’re participating in a very British ritual of sophistication distinction.
Social media platforms much like X lengthen these class-based discussions previous the distinctive broadcast. They create an ongoing home for public commentary and judgement. On this technique, actuality TV continues to function as what sociologists and cultural theorists Beverley Skeggs and Helen Picket describe as a “barometer of current moral price, model and authority”.
For Ditchfield and Sellman and others participating on this and totally different actuality displays, standard notions of working-class respectability and shame are reworked through their media visibility and exaggerated performances, from emotional outbursts to accusations of bullying.
Analysis of various actuality displaysmuch like Geordie Shore, have confirmed that such visibility comes at a significant value. Whereas this behaviour would possibly protected people show time, it concurrently subjects them to class-based criticism. Surely TV, class identities are every carried out and, in the long run, policed.
Social media intensifies these dynamics. Platforms like X promise democratisation of voice, nevertheless they normally amplify, barely than drawback, present social hierarchies.
As a result of the reactions to Married At First Sight UK present, even when reliable concerns about gender-based damage are raised, these very important discussions can turn into entangled with, and sometimes overshadowed by, deep-rooted class biases.
Class snobbery and sexism keep actuality TV’s most enduring and toxic marriage – a union that displays no sign of dissolution throughout the 2020s.